• Khuteja Nasreen

The present most available criticism on Indo-English literature is the themes of domestic’s life, which is having much value, looks upon it as a part of Indian literature. Contemporary theories have stress over its Indianness, which is the main issue of approving focus and Indian authors have used Indianness or a lack of it as their primary criterion for judgment. This approach is quite in line up with the Indo-English writer's own sense of his being a part of the Indian literary scenario. At the same time, most of them would take away from defining Indianness in a special way and they even excluded it in analyzing the motifs of Indian English literature. They see nothing an Indian in their use of English for creative expressions. The Indo-English writers must keep in view the needs of the time while writing either a novel or writing a poem. According to K.D. Katrak, “there is no necessary or unbreakable relationship between Indianness and the use of English for creative expression”.1

Domestic Life, Ruth Prawer Jhabvala

"DOMESTIC LIFE OF RUTH PRAWER JHABVALA'S FICTION", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.4, Issue 4, page no.776-781, April-2017, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1704145.pdf

"DOMESTIC LIFE OF RUTH PRAWER JHABVALA'S FICTION", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.4, Issue 4, page no. pp776-781, April-2017, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1704145.pdf