• Dr. Advita Neville Deepak
• Dr. Roma Patel
• Dr. Karishma Patel

Background: Swimming is one of the most popular Olympic sports. Competitive swimming has a long history and is currently one of the largest Olympic sports. Despite the game’s world-wide popularity, recent data shows its lack of popularity in India. Competitive swimmers are suggested to have specific anthropometrical features compared with other athletes thus engage in large volumes of training in the pool and on dry land. Purpose of the study The purpose of the study is to determine the effectiveness of aquatic plyometric versus tabata training on improving endurance and strength in young adult swimmers so that better and specific training guidelines can be formulated Methodology Samples of n=30 swimmers between the ages of 18-25 years were included in the study. Subjects are divided into two groups by using chit method Group-A (APT) and Group B (TT). The study is carried out for the duration of 6 months the protocol for both the group is for 3 days per week for 5 weeks. Study design: Experimental study Outcomes: calculated at the start of the training and at the last day of training by using Cooper's run test and Vertical jump test. Results The mean and average strength and endurance of group A before training is 49.54 & 43.98 and after training is 55.91 & 58.01. And in group B before training is 48.30 & 40.03 and after training is 53.18 & 45.92. This shows slight significant increase (p<0.05) in group A than group B. Conclusion Therefore we concluded that aquatic plyometric training and tabata training both have improved performance but group A receiving aquatic plyometric training showed more powerful improvement in strength and endurance in swimmer.

Background: Swimming is one of the most popular Olympic sports. Competitive swimming has a long history and is currently one of the largest Olympic sports. Despite the game’s world-wide popularity, recent data shows its lack of popularity in India. Competitive swimmers are suggested to have specific anthropometrical features compared with other athletes thus engage in large volumes of training in the pool and on dry land. Purpose of the study The purpose of the study is to determine the effectiveness of aquatic plyometric versus tabata training on improving endurance and strength in young adult swimmers so that better and specific training guidelines can be formulated Methodology Samples of n=30 swimmers between the ages of 18-25 years were included in the study. Subjects are divided into two groups by using chit method Group-A (APT) and Group B (TT). The study is carried out for the duration of 6 months the protocol for both the group is for 3 days per week for 5 weeks. Study design: Experimental study Outcomes: calculated at the start of the training and at the last day of training by using Cooper's run test and Vertical jump test. Results The mean and average strength and endurance of group A before training is 49.54 & 43.98 and after training is 55.91 & 58.01. And in group B before training is 48.30 & 40.03 and after training is 53.18 & 45.92. This shows slight significant increase (p<0.05) in group A than group B. Conclusion Therefore we concluded that aquatic plyometric training and tabata training both have improved performance but group A receiving aquatic plyometric training showed more powerful improvement in strength and endurance in swimmer. Key words: Aquatic plyometric training, Tabata training, strength, Endurance.

"Effectiveness of Aquatic Plyometric training versus Tabata training on improving endurance and strength in young adult swimmers: An experimental study", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.6, Issue 6, page no.1-7, June 2019, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2008001.pdf

"Effectiveness of Aquatic Plyometric training versus Tabata training on improving endurance and strength in young adult swimmers: An experimental study", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.6, Issue 6, page no. pp1-7, June 2019, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2008001.pdf