UGC Approved Journal no 63975

ISSN: 2349-5162 | ESTD Year : 2014
Call for Paper
Volume 9 | Issue 1 | January 2022

JETIREXPLORE- Search Thousands of research papers



WhatsApp Contact
Click Here

Published in:

Volume 8 Issue 7
July-2021
eISSN: 2349-5162

UGC and ISSN approved 7.95 impact factor UGC Approved Journal no 63975

7.95 impact factor calculated by Google scholar

Unique Identifier

Published Paper ID:
JETIR2107281


Registration ID:
312364

Page Number

c127-c132

Share This Article


Jetir RMS

Title

Comparing The Effect Of Earthquake On High Rise Buildings With Shear Wall And Flanged Concrete Column

Abstract

Seismic tremor never kills individuals yet the imperfect designs do. The steadiness and solidness of any design is the significant issue of worry in any elevated structures. Shear dividers are primary individuals which oppose parallel powers transcendent on second opposing edge. Shear dividers are most favored primary dividers for tremor obstruction. This examination is identified with correlation of shear divider type structure with second opposing kind of building. The current investigation states three sort of models, second opposing casing for example model 1, Shear divider assembling concentrically situated along X-pivot on external outskirts of building for example model 2, and Concrete segment rib concentrically situated on external fringe along the X-pivot for example model 3. Models of the three designs with same stacking were made on STADDPro and were dissected and further they where thought about for their appropriateness. For 10 story building and 3 inlets along X-hub of 4m each and 4 sounds along Z-hub of 4m each were thought of and loads were applied according to the IS details. The examination was directed according to the details of IS principles IS 13920, IS 1893, IS 875, IS 456. From the outcome it is seen that there is decline of around 10% in Lateral story shear and Base shear when the second opposing casing was presented with shear divider. Along these lines the model 2 and model 3 had 10% less horizontal power and base shear when contrasted with the model 1. Likewise the consequences of Axial power, bowing second, Node dislodging were found sufficiently not exactly the second opposing casing. Whenever cost is been looked at, then, at that point model 3 can be expressed as prudent in all sense since for a similar design and burden it more noteworthy steadiness and solidness as checked from the hub dislodging results.

Key Words

Shear Wall, Flanged Concrete Column, STADDPro

Cite This Article

"Comparing The Effect Of Earthquake On High Rise Buildings With Shear Wall And Flanged Concrete Column ", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.8, Issue 7, page no.c127-c132, July-2021, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2107281.pdf

ISSN


2349-5162 | Impact Factor 7.95 Calculate by Google Scholar

An International Scholarly Open Access Journal, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed Journal Impact Factor 7.95 Calculate by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage Journal Indexing in All Major Database & Metadata, Citation Generator

Cite This Article

"Comparing The Effect Of Earthquake On High Rise Buildings With Shear Wall And Flanged Concrete Column ", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.8, Issue 7, page no. ppc127-c132, July-2021, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2107281.pdf

Publication Details

Published Paper ID: JETIR2107281
Registration ID: 312364
Published In: Volume 8 | Issue 7 | Year July-2021
DOI (Digital Object Identifier):
Page No: c127-c132
Country: Nagpur, Maharashtra, India .
Area: Engineering
ISSN Number: 2349-5162


Preview This Article


Downlaod

Click here for Article Preview

Download PDF

Downloads

000174

Print This Page

Current Call For Paper

Jetir RMS