• Pushpa Sharma

The following study paper goes through Sections 6 and 32 of the Indian Evidence Act of 1872 in great detail. The Indian Evidence Act has two parts that lay out two distinct concepts. The Indian Evidence Act of 1872 is unique in that it not only standardizes the mechanism for evidence disclosure, but it also establishes whose testimony is acceptable. Relevant Facts are facts that have a certain degree of probative force. Cause-and-effect forces can be used to judge the relevance of facts. Section 6 and Section 32 lay out two different principles. Hearsay proof is permitted under Section 6 provided specific circumstances are met, and includes acts that speak for themselves, but hearsay proof is prohibited under Section 32. Instead, in the event of the death or disability of the person who was expected to give testimony, a document or any other person concerned will be called to testify.

Evidence, Hearsay Proof, Permissible, Document, Death, Disability.

"RELATION BETWEEN SECTION 6 AND 32 OF EVIDENCE ACT ", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.6, Issue 2, page no.286-289, February-2019, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIRFJ06060.pdf

"RELATION BETWEEN SECTION 6 AND 32 OF EVIDENCE ACT ", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.6, Issue 2, page no. pp286-289, February-2019, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIRFJ06060.pdf