UGC Approved Journal no 63975

ISSN: 2349-5162 | ESTD Year : 2014
Call for Paper
Volume 8 | Issue 7 | July 2021

JETIREXPLORE- Search Thousands of research papers



WhatsApp Contact
Click Here


Submit Paper : http://www.jetir.org/submit-paper | Call for Paper | Recent Published Issue: Click Here to visit. | Recent Published Issue: Click Here to visit. | Call for Paper | Call for Paper | JETIR is Scholarly Open Access, Peer-Reviewed (Peer Review), Refereed, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage, Online, Print Journal, ISSN Approved Journal Submit Paper : http://www.jetir.org/submit-paper | Recent Published Issue: Click Here to visit. | Call for Paper | JETIR is Scholarly Open Access, Peer-Reviewed (Peer Review), Refereed, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage, Online, Print Journal, ISSN Approved Journal Submit Paper : http://www.jetir.org/submit-paper | Submit Your Paper Online | Recent Published Issue: Click Here to visit. | JETIR is Scholarly Open Access, Peer-Reviewed (Peer Review), Refereed, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage, Online, Print Journal, ISSN Approved Journal Submit Paper : http://www.jetir.org/submit-paper | Publication Charges | JETIR is Scholarly Open Access, Peer-Reviewed (Peer Review), Refereed, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage, Online, Print Journal, ISSN Approved Journal Submit Paper : http://www.jetir.org/submit-paper | Recent Published Issue: Click Here to visit. | Recent Published Issue: Click Here to visit. | JETIR is Scholarly Open Access, Peer-Reviewed (Peer Review), Refereed, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage, Online, Print Journal, ISSN Approved Journal Call for Paper | Recent Published Issue: Click Here to visit. |

Current Issue Details

Call for Paper

Volume 8 | Issue 7
July 2021


7.95 Impact Factor

Cilck Here For More Info


Review Results Notification:
Within 01-02 Days.

Publication of Paper:
Within 01-02 Days after Submititng All Required documents.


ISSUE DETAILS

Current Issue

Archive
Important Resource (Third party ads)

Find help with any tech scinces at Domyhomework123.com
Mypaperwriter.com has unique term paper and research paper samples on more than 5000 topics for you to use.

Facts & Figures

Issues Per Year : 12
Volumes Published : 8
Issues Published : 86

Official FB Page



Like Our Facebook Page



Publication Ethics Policy & COPE Ethics and malpractice statement

COPE Ethics Guidelines
COPE Ethics (Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement)
The following statements are based on Elsevier recommendations and COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors




The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed journal is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of work of the author and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior.


Publication Ethics Policy contain below step

  1. 1. Authorship of the paper
  2. 2. Originality and plagiarism
  3. 3. Data access and retention
  4. 4. Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication.
  5. 5. Acknowledgment of sources
  6. 6. Disclosure and conflicts of interest
  7. 7. Fundamental errors in published works.
  8. 8. Reporting standards.
  9. 9. Hazards and human or animal subjects.
  10. 10. Use of patient images or case details.



To maintain fair practice we at JETIR strongly believe in following these guidelines. We are committed to fair practice of publication. Success in this regard can be achieved if ethics are well practiced by following participants:

(1) Authors, (2) Editors, (3) Reviewers & (4) Publisher

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Duties of authors:

Reporting standards Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review and professional publication articles should also be accurate and objective, and editorial 'opinion' works should be clearly identified as such.

Data access and retention Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of other’ that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism takes many forms, from 'passing off' another's paper as the author's own paper, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another's paper (without attribution), to claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.

Acknowledgement of sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Information obtained in the course of confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, must not be used without the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in these services.

Authorship of the paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and human or animal subjects
If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript. If the work involves the use of animal or human subjects, the author should ensure that the manuscript contains a statement that all procedures were performed in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines and that the appropriate institutional committee(s) has approved them. Authors should include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must always be observed.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Examples of potential conflicts of interest which should be disclosed include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. If the editor or the publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains a significant error, it is the obligation of the author to promptly retract or correct the paper or provide evidence to the editor of the correctness of the original paper.

2. Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Duties of editors:

Publication decisions
The editor of a peer-reviewed journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published, often working in conjunction with the relevant society (for society-owned or sponsored journals). The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers (or society officers) in making this decision.

Fair play
An editor should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Editors should recues themselves (i.e. should ask a co-editor, associate editor or other member of the editorial board instead to review and consider) from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or (possibly) institutions connected to the papers. Editors should require all contributors to disclose relevant competing interests and publish corrections if competing interests are revealed after publication. If needed, other appropriate action should be taken, such as the publication of a retraction or expression of concern. It should be ensured that the peer-review process for sponsored supplements is the same as that used for the main journal. Items in sponsored supplements should be accepted solely on the basis of academic merit and interest to readers and not be influenced by commercial considerations. Non-peer reviewed sections of their journal should be clearly identified.

Involvement and cooperation in investigations
An editor should take reasonably responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper, in conjunction with the publisher (or society). Such measures will generally include contacting the author of the manuscript or paper and giving due consideration of the respective complaint or claims made, but may also include further communications to the relevant institutions and research bodies, and if the complaint is upheld, the publication of a correction, retraction, expression of concern, or other note, as may be relevant. Every reported act of unethical publishing behavior must be looked into, even if it is discovered years after publication.

3. Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Duties of reviewers:

Contribution to editorial decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. Peer review is an essential component of formal scholarly communication, and lies at the heart of the scientific method. Academy Publisher shares the view of many that all scholars who wish to contribute to publications have an obligation to do a fair share of reviewing.

Promptness Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and conflict of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

4. Publisher: JETIR does not allow any form of plagiarism. Plagiarism is considered to be a serious breach of scientific ethics by the entire scientific community. Incidents of plagiarism in a manuscript or published paper whether detected or reported, will be dealt seriously. We constantly support/advise and take suggestions from our Editors/Editorial Board/Reviewers on avoiding any malpractice of publication ethics.
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed journal is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of work of the author and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior.


Copyright Infringement Claims Policy

Any claims of copyright infringement should be addressed to the Editor at editor@jetir.org bearing the subject line "Copyright Infringement".

JETIR- Journal of Emerging Technology and Innovative Research(12 issues annually).

Brief About JETIR:

  • » JETIR- Journal of Emerging Technology and Innovative Research
  • » An International Open Access Journal
  • » ISSN - 2349-5162
  • » Impact Factor - 7.95
  • » Frequency - 12 Issues per year
  • » Published by - J.E.T.I.R., India


The JETIR and Authors hereby agree as follows: In consideration of JETIR reviewing and editing the above described work for first publication on an exclusive basis:

The undersigned author(s) hereby assigns, conveys, and otherwise transfers all rights, title, interest, and copyright ownership of said work for publication.

Work includes the material submitted for publication and any other related material submitted to JETIR. In the event that JETIR does not publish said work, the author(s) will/will not be so notified and all rights assigned hereunder will revert to the author(s).

The assignment of rights to JETIR includes but is not expressly limited to rights to edit, publish, reproduce, distribute copies, include in indexes or search databases in print, electronic, or other media, whether or not in use at the time of execution of this agreement, and claim copyright in said work throughout the world for the full duration of the copyright and any renewals or extensions thereof.

All accepted works become the property of JETIR and may not be published elsewhere without prior written permission from JETIR. The author(s) hereby represents and warrants that they are sole author(s) of the work, that all authors have participated in and agree with the content and conclusions of the work, that the work is original, and does not infringe upon any copyright, propriety, or personal right of any third party, and that no part of it nor any work based on substantially similar data has been submitted to another publication. However, reproduction, posting, transmission or other distribution or use of the article or any material contained therein, in any medium as permitted hereunder, requires a citation to the Journal and appropriate credit to JETIR as publisher, suitable in form and content as follows: Title of article, author(s), journal title and volume/issue, Copyright© year.

Corresponding author/s also warrant that "JETIR and the Journal Editors” will not be held liable against all copyright claims of any third party or in lawsuits that may be filed in the future, and that Corresponding author/s will be the only person who will be liable in such cases. Corresponding author/s also warrant that the article contains no libelous or unlawful statements, Corresponding author/s did not use any unlawful method or material during the research, I/we obtained all legal permissions pertaining to the research, and Corresponding author/s adhered to ethical principles during the research.

ISSN Number



JETIR is Scholarly Open Access, Peer-Reviewed (Peer Review), Refereed, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage, Online, Print Journal, Impact factor 7.95 Calculate by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool, ISSN Approved Journal


Journal Starting Year (ESTD) : 2014

DOI


Archives

Open Access

This material is Open Knowledge
This material is Open Data
This material is Open Content

Jetir RMS