• Adv. Aayushi Selot
• Adv. Pranjal Shukla

I. Abstract This paper explores the concept of unconscionable contracts, which are agreements that are so one-sided and oppressive that they shock the conscience of the court. The paper begins by providing an overview of the legal doctrine of unconscionability, including its historical development and current status in common law jurisdictions. The paper then examines some of the criticisms of the doctrine, including its subjective nature and potential for abuse. The paper also explores some of the alternatives to unconscionability, such as the doctrine of good faith and fair dealing, and evaluates their effectiveness in protecting parties from unfair contracts. Finally, the paper concludes by suggesting some possible reforms to the doctrine of unconscionability, such as the adoption of more objective standards for evaluating unconscionability and the development of more effective remedies for parties who have been harmed by unconscionable contracts. Overall, this paper contributes to the ongoing debate about the role of contract law in protecting parties from exploitation and unfairness, and provides some valuable insights for policymakers, legal practitioners, and scholars.

#contract #civilLaw #unconscionable contracts #TheIndianContractAct #unconscionability

"Beyond the fine print: A critical examination of unconscionable contracts", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.11, Issue 5, page no.f756-f772, May-2024, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2405585.pdf

"Beyond the fine print: A critical examination of unconscionable contracts", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.11, Issue 5, page no. ppf756-f772, May-2024, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2405585.pdf