• Rekharani Musalle
• Dr P V K S R amarao

This article concerns and recommends several measures to enable ICANN to transform the UDRP into a more effective and uniform mechanism for resolving international disputes. By amending the UDRP to add specific examples of conduct that violates the policy, as well as examples of conduct that should be considered explicitly beyond its scope, the problem of inconsistent decisions should be addressed. In connection with this, the UDRP amendments should attempt to dispel any appearance of pro-corporate bias and should encourage fair use as a justification for registering and using trademarked domain names. Finally, conclude that the Internet community's interests will be best served if all country code registration authorities and non-ICANN accredited providers submit to either the UDRP or an identical dispute resolution policy, and suggest methods by which ICANN can support achieving this goal.

resolving international disputes; DOMAINNAME DISPUTES AND RESOLUTION

"A CRITICAL STUDY OF DOMAINNAME DISPUTES AND RESOLUTION", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.6, Issue 3, page no.136-140, March-2019, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1903424.pdf

"A CRITICAL STUDY OF DOMAINNAME DISPUTES AND RESOLUTION", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.6, Issue 3, page no. pp136-140, March-2019, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1903424.pdf