• Ayush Kansal

The Right to personal liberty has the long history from antediluvian time edicts of Ashoka shows the history of Right to life & personal liberty. There are other Fundamental Rights which have additionally relationship with the liberty of a person. In view of this categorical provision in the Constitution, the judiciary working under the influence of the pre Constitutional philosophy, additionally conceptually interpreted Article 21 to operate in a inhibited area but one dissent in Gopalan sparked the light for incipient directions. This massage was taken by other Judges and conclusively when we come to 1978 a lone voice became the voice of all the Judges. The position now is that the Right to personal liberty changes with the transmuting conditions & circumstances so that many more Right, not circumstances so that many more Rights, not given the status of Fundamental Rights germinates through Article 21. It will not be hyperbole to verbalize that the Indian” personal liberty clause has become fountain source of residuary Fundamental Rights, on achievement which has yet to reach to some of the developed & least developed countries. Article 21 was coached in negative language as the Constitution Assembly wanted positive Action on the port of the State.

Fundamental Rights, personal liberty, developed countries, positive Action, State.

"Meaning Of Life and Personal Liberty Under Article 21 of the Constitution of India", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.6, Issue 4, page no.14-23, April-2019, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1904804.pdf

"Meaning Of Life and Personal Liberty Under Article 21 of the Constitution of India", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.6, Issue 4, page no. pp14-23, April-2019, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1904804.pdf