• Sayeed ur Rahman
• Dr. Sabih Ahmad

High-rise buildings are exposed to both static and dynamic loads. During earthquakes it is seen that many of structure are totally or partially damaged due to seismic loads. So, it is necessary to determine seismic responses of such buildings. There are different techniques of seismic analysis of structure. Time history analysis and response spectrum analysis are the two methods commonly used for dynamic analysis. In this paper dynamic analysis is done for G+15 residential building with and without shear wall. The main purpose of this study is to carry out a detailed analysis on simulation tools ETABS and STAAD0-Pro, which have been used for dynamic analysis of the G+15 building model. This study is focused on bringing out advantages of using ETABS over current practices of STAAD-Pro. It was observed that ETABS is more user friendly, accurate, compatible for analysing design results and many more advantages to be discussed in this study over STAADPRO. The dynamic analysis is done by the two softwares and various results such as maximum storey displacement, maximum storey shear, frequencies and time periods were compared and discussed with and without shear wall simultaneously.

Dynamic Analysis, Tall buildings, STAAD PRO, E-TABS, displacement, storey shear, frequency and time periods.

"A Comparative study on Dynamic Analysis of Tall Buildings using STTAAD-Pro and ETABS.", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.6, Issue 4, page no.350-358, April-2019, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1904B52.pdf

"A Comparative study on Dynamic Analysis of Tall Buildings using STTAAD-Pro and ETABS.", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.6, Issue 4, page no. pp350-358, April-2019, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1904B52.pdf