UGC Approved Journal no 63975(19)

ISSN: 2349-5162 | ESTD Year : 2014
Call for Paper
Volume 11 | Issue 5 | May 2024

JETIREXPLORE- Search Thousands of research papers



WhatsApp Contact
Click Here

Published in:

Volume 6 Issue 4
April-2019
eISSN: 2349-5162

UGC and ISSN approved 7.95 impact factor UGC Approved Journal no 63975

7.95 impact factor calculated by Google scholar

Unique Identifier

Published Paper ID:
JETIR1904E55


Registration ID:
206449

Page Number

324-331

Share This Article


Jetir RMS

Title

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN MASONRY AND AAC INFILLED WALL BUILDING UNDER DYNAMIC LOADING

Abstract

A reinforced concrete building with masonry infill is most common type of construction in India. Traditionally, conventional clay bricks or concrete blocks which are heavy rigid materials have been used as Infill wall. Though, AAC (aerated light weight concrete) blocks which are lightweight, flexible building materials that provides insulation and fire resistance and have lower impact on environment, can be used as masonry infill (MI) material in buildings. AAC blocks are now also available in India. A number of researchers have studied the behavior of AAC in-filled reinforced concrete (RC) frames experimentally. The experimental result have shown that the AAC blocks infilled RC frame exhibits better performance subjected to lateral loads than that of conventional bricks infilled frames. The study of the effect of types of infill materials used on the performance of RC infilled frames is still limited. Hence in present report, comparative study of the effect of type of infill wall material on seismic response of structure has been presented. AAC blocks and conventional clay bricks materials are used for the comparison. To check the behavior of RC frames with both AAC block and conventional clay bricks infill, analysis has been done using ETABS. Two G+8 Storey building model are considered for Comparison. One is Bare frame with masonry infill and the other is Bare frame with AAC infill wall. The results have shown that AAC block as infill material performs better under seismic loading than conventional brick.

Key Words

Cite This Article

"COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN MASONRY AND AAC INFILLED WALL BUILDING UNDER DYNAMIC LOADING", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.6, Issue 4, page no.324-331, April-2019, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1904E55.pdf

ISSN


2349-5162 | Impact Factor 7.95 Calculate by Google Scholar

An International Scholarly Open Access Journal, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed Journal Impact Factor 7.95 Calculate by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage Journal Indexing in All Major Database & Metadata, Citation Generator

Cite This Article

"COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN MASONRY AND AAC INFILLED WALL BUILDING UNDER DYNAMIC LOADING", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.6, Issue 4, page no. pp324-331, April-2019, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1904E55.pdf

Publication Details

Published Paper ID: JETIR1904E55
Registration ID: 206449
Published In: Volume 6 | Issue 4 | Year April-2019
DOI (Digital Object Identifier):
Page No: 324-331
Country: SURAT, GUJARAT, India .
Area: Engineering
ISSN Number: 2349-5162
Publisher: IJ Publication


Preview This Article


Downlaod

Click here for Article Preview

Download PDF

Downloads

0002856

Print This Page

Current Call For Paper

Jetir RMS