• Bikash Kumar

The argument is not convincing; it clearly overstates both the evil conditions prior to the British rule. It attributes material progress solely to alien rule rather than to the general march of science which has coincided with the period of British dominance. At best the imperialist case smacks too much of the occupations of another man’s house by saying, ''I keep order in the household and I keep the other burglars out.'' American press opinion, concerning Indian national list struggle vis-à-vis Mahatma Gandhi. A small section of the US media, having Anglophilic proclivities, often reflected pro-British prejudice in its reprotings on India Led by C hristian Science Report and the New York Heral Tribune, this section had placed heavy reliance on the “facts” supplied by the British Information Service in the United States. It is noteworthy that this agency published a brocgyre or brochure entitled, ”Fifty facts About India”. Where ever it went in India hostile crowd everywhere displayed placards and banners that read “Go back, Simon”, but the Philadelphia Inquirer had altogether different analysis to convey.

British rule, US media, American press, non-cooperation movement

"The American Media And Gandhiji"s Campains In Indian Movement", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.6, Issue 4, page no.1693-1699, April-2019, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1904S49.pdf

"The American Media And Gandhiji"s Campains In Indian Movement", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.6, Issue 4, page no. pp1693-1699, April-2019, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1904S49.pdf