• Gurudev Sahil

The Supreme Court is the guardian of the Constitution and the Judiciary is deemed to protect the rights of citizens from inimical state actions through proper interpretational skills and application of the law. Nonetheless the design of the contours of this power of review has been gradually determined and amended by Judiciary itself. With the frequent wielding of Judicial activism by the Judicial machinery and owing to its far reaching bid it has to be earnestly broached whether the value of Judicial restraint should be ingrained vide Constitutionalism or let the ever growing reach of Judicial reach grossly undermine the sovereignty of parliament.

Judicial activism, Organs of state, Judicial Restraint, Constitutional Morality, Judicial Discretion, checks and balances, Separation of powers.

"Why Judicial Activism Needs Rein of Judicial Restraint", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.6, Issue 5, page no.828-833, May-2019, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1905S24.pdf

"Why Judicial Activism Needs Rein of Judicial Restraint", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.6, Issue 5, page no. pp828-833, May-2019, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1905S24.pdf