UGC Approved Journal no 63975(19)

ISSN: 2349-5162 | ESTD Year : 2014
Call for Paper
Volume 11 | Issue 5 | May 2024

JETIREXPLORE- Search Thousands of research papers



WhatsApp Contact
Click Here

Published in:

Volume 6 Issue 6
June-2019
eISSN: 2349-5162

UGC and ISSN approved 7.95 impact factor UGC Approved Journal no 63975

7.95 impact factor calculated by Google scholar

Unique Identifier

Published Paper ID:
JETIR1907192


Registration ID:
217964

Page Number

352-359

Share This Article


Jetir RMS

Title

Comparison of Mulligan Technique and Conventional Technique in Patients with Low Back Pain

Authors

Abstract

Background: Spinal mobilization is described in terms of improving mobility in areas of the spine that are restricted [5].Such restriction may be found in joints, connective tissues or muscles. These restrictions can occur due to muscle spasm, reduced joint mobility reduced muscle flexibility etc. By removing the restriction by mobilization the source of pain is reduced and the patient experiences symptomatic relief. Hence Mulligan technique plays vital role to reduce pain and increase range of motion in patients with low back pain which will improve patient’s functional capability. Materials and Methods: A total number of 60 patients with low back pain were selectedDepend on selection criteria. These patients were randomly divided into two groups. Each group having 30 patients. One group was treatedWith Mulligan technique and IFT for 3days a week for 2 week & other group is treated with conventional physiotherapy abdominal strengthening exercise and IFT for 3 days in a week for 2 week. The objectives were tested by using Modified Oswestry Disability Index. The values are collectedbefore and after the treatment. Results: The Post test mean value ofModified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index (MODI) in group A is 12.21and in group B is 22.07. This shows thatModified OswestryLow Back Pain Disability Index (MODI) in Group B disability value were comparatively more than Group A disability value, P<0.0001.Statistical Analysis of post test, Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index (MODI) revealed that there is high statically significant difference seen between group A and group B.Conclusion: This study shows better improvement in reducing low back pain in Mulligan technique than traditional abdominal strengthening exercise. Both the techniques can be used in clinical practice

Key Words

Low Back Pain, SNAGS

Cite This Article

"Comparison of Mulligan Technique and Conventional Technique in Patients with Low Back Pain", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.6, Issue 6, page no.352-359, June 2019, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1907192.pdf

ISSN


2349-5162 | Impact Factor 7.95 Calculate by Google Scholar

An International Scholarly Open Access Journal, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed Journal Impact Factor 7.95 Calculate by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage Journal Indexing in All Major Database & Metadata, Citation Generator

Cite This Article

"Comparison of Mulligan Technique and Conventional Technique in Patients with Low Back Pain", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.6, Issue 6, page no. pp352-359, June 2019, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1907192.pdf

Publication Details

Published Paper ID: JETIR1907192
Registration ID: 217964
Published In: Volume 6 | Issue 6 | Year June-2019
DOI (Digital Object Identifier):
Page No: 352-359
Country: chennai, tamil nadu, India .
Area: Medical Science
ISSN Number: 2349-5162
Publisher: IJ Publication


Preview This Article


Downlaod

Click here for Article Preview

Download PDF

Downloads

0002793

Print This Page

Current Call For Paper

Jetir RMS