• J. DHILEBAN J. DHILEBAN
• Dr.J.Thirumal

The main objective of this paper is to determine the compare and contradiction of the Nyaya and Aristotelian logical fallacies. From the world most famous, two philosopher’s logic are identical, first the great Indian philosopher’s Aksapada Gautama (BCE 550) Nyaya logic and Nyaya Sutra, Anviksiki or Tarka or Science of logic its philosophy is called the philosophy of logical realism and the second western great Greek philosopher Aristotle (BCE 383-322). Traditional logic there, the inference of these two eminent is discussed Aristotle defines fallacy that “A logical fallacy is roughly an error of reasoning” kinds of the deductive fallacies are two parts immediate and mediate. Another Division of logic is inductive fallacy. By this the comparison and contradiction of the Hetvabhasa, the fallacy of Nyaya to the five kinds of material fallacy Naiyayikas are taken into account fundament Nyaya (Anumana) inference of Hetvabhasa are described by Vyapti. The violation of rules of syllogism is treated as Fallacy thus the concept of syllogism also to be discussed here syllogism comprises three member major premise, minor premise, and conclusion Nyaya five members of syllogism are Pretijna, Hetu, Udaharana, Upanaya and Nigamana.

Fallacy, immediate and mediate, Syllogism, Major premise, Minor premise, conclusion, Anumana, Paksa, Sadhya, Linga, Hetu, Vyapti, Hetvabhasa.

"The Compare and Contradiction of Nyaya and Aristotelian Logical Fallacies", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.6, Issue 6, page no.278-285, June 2019, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1907639.pdf

"The Compare and Contradiction of Nyaya and Aristotelian Logical Fallacies", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.6, Issue 6, page no. pp278-285, June 2019, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1907639.pdf