• Prof. L.UdayaKumar
• Dr. Karra Jaya Rao

In western political theory, so-called liberal and communitarian thinkers have debated with each other for years about the why question, whilst agreeing substantially on a range of ethical values characteristic of liberal social, economic and political orders. But once this debate is globalized across different types of political community, each with its own complex of moral traditions, then disagreement over the why question also becomes disagreement over what ethical values count as genuinely. Discourse ethics builds on deontology and contractualism, but also on Habermas’s consensus theory of truth, to argue that justice can be identified with the agreed position of those affected, following discussion under conditions of fair argu¬mentation. But even though discourse ethics follows a ration¬alist path, it already signals a departure from the model of moral knowledge implicit in utilitarian, contractualist and deontological arguments. This is because it denies that moral knowledge is attainable and demonstrable on the basis of the rational inquiry of an individual moral agent, or that moral truth can exist independent of people’s agreement with it. The application and implementation of justice presupposes some kind of inter-subjective process in the working out of what justice means.

Society, Development, Ethics, Economics, Peacemaking, Justice, Conflict …etc

"SOCIAL AND ECONOMICAL PRINCIPLES AND ITS DEVELOPMENT ", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.6, Issue 6, page no.251-259, June 2019, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1907E37.pdf

"SOCIAL AND ECONOMICAL PRINCIPLES AND ITS DEVELOPMENT ", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.6, Issue 6, page no. pp251-259, June 2019, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1907E37.pdf