• Dr. Renu Mahajan
• Anmol Garg

In our society, the crucial concern for doctors and clinicians is to provide soothing excellence and concern of living affairs to the people who are suffering with fatal illness such as highly developed “cancer and AIDS”. The parallel apprehension to one more debatable subject regarding “euthanasia” or “mercy –killing” of those who are suffering with incurable diseases. According to the advocates of Physician Assisted Suicide a person should decide an effortless death for himself. However, according to the opponents, the role of a physician in the individual’s death of violates the middle principle of the medical profession. Moreover, people suffering from undiagnosed misery and demanding Physician Assisted Suicide get into additional inquiry on moral values, which are primary the work of euthanasia. Firm guidelines are led to implement to Physician Assisted Suicide. The role of analyst becomes crucial when the appraisal of the psychological state of the person, who has given his consent to PAS becomes mandatory. Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS) is although considered illegal in our country; however, there are quite a few proponents, who are working in favor of charitable establishments such as “death with dignity” organization which supports the idea of PAS. The condition is now even more improved after the recent judgment given by in the Honorable Supreme Court Judgment in the Common Cause case in 2019.

Euthanasia: The Indian Perspective

"Euthanasia: The Indian Perspective", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.7, Issue 5, page no.601-606, May-2020, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2005225.pdf

"Euthanasia: The Indian Perspective", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.7, Issue 5, page no. pp601-606, May-2020, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2005225.pdf