UGC Approved Journal no 63975(19)

ISSN: 2349-5162 | ESTD Year : 2014
Call for Paper
Volume 11 | Issue 4 | April 2024

JETIREXPLORE- Search Thousands of research papers



WhatsApp Contact
Click Here

Published in:

Volume 7 Issue 12
December-2020
eISSN: 2349-5162

UGC and ISSN approved 7.95 impact factor UGC Approved Journal no 63975

7.95 impact factor calculated by Google scholar

Unique Identifier

Published Paper ID:
JETIR2012094


Registration ID:
304037

Page Number

736-740

Share This Article


Jetir RMS

Title

Open Versus Closed Vaginal Cuff Closure Technique Following Elective Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background: Total abdominal hysterectomy is the most frequently performed gynecologic operation and surgical technique of hysterectomy may include either open or a closed vaginal cuff. There are no standard recommendations or guidelines regarding management of vaginal cuff. This study aimed to determine the advantages and disadvantages of open versus closed vaginal cuff closure technique following elective abdominal hysterectomies. Methodology: This is a randomized controlled trial (open label) involving eighty eight women undergoing elective hysterectomy were randomized to either open or closed vaginal cuff technique. The independents sample t test was used to compare differences between continuous variables namely age, operating time, length of hospital stay, estimated blood loss, allowable blood loss and surgical costs. Statistical tool used to compare bleeding , dehiscence, granulation and pelvic hematoma was z test on two proportions. Cramers v test were used to compare the gravidity and parity. A p value of <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Open and closed vaginal cuff techniques did not differ in terms of operating time (114 vs. 110 minutes; p= 0.53), length of hospital stay (4.67 vs. 4.54 days; p=0.64), estimated blood loss ( 306.90 vs. 338.13 ml; p=0.26 ) and surgical cost (5995.26 vs. 5862.94; p=0.55). Both techniques were similar in the clinical judgement of surgeons. This study showed that open and closed vaginal cuff technique techniques were comparable in terms of pain (5.40 vs. 5.42; p=0.53) vaginal discharge (40.48% vs. 23. 91 % respectively; p=0.11) and healing. Conclusion: Both techniques of hysterectomy gave similar outcomes regarding length of hospital stay, operating time, estimated blood loss, surgical costs, post-operative morbidities and clinical judgement of surgeons. In terms of pain, bleeding, discharge and healing, both techniques showed no significant difference. Our study failed to show inferiority in favor of either of the surgical techniques.

Key Words

hysterectomy, open vaginal cuff technique, closed vaginal cuff technique

Cite This Article

" Open Versus Closed Vaginal Cuff Closure Technique Following Elective Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.7, Issue 12, page no.736-740, December-2020, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2012094.pdf

ISSN


2349-5162 | Impact Factor 7.95 Calculate by Google Scholar

An International Scholarly Open Access Journal, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed Journal Impact Factor 7.95 Calculate by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage Journal Indexing in All Major Database & Metadata, Citation Generator

Cite This Article

" Open Versus Closed Vaginal Cuff Closure Technique Following Elective Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.7, Issue 12, page no. pp736-740, December-2020, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2012094.pdf

Publication Details

Published Paper ID: JETIR2012094
Registration ID: 304037
Published In: Volume 7 | Issue 12 | Year December-2020
DOI (Digital Object Identifier):
Page No: 736-740
Country: Baguio City, Benguet, Philippines .
Area: Medical Science
ISSN Number: 2349-5162
Publisher: IJ Publication


Preview This Article


Downlaod

Click here for Article Preview

Download PDF

Downloads

0002986

Print This Page

Current Call For Paper

Jetir RMS