UGC Approved Journal no 63975(19)

ISSN: 2349-5162 | ESTD Year : 2014
Call for Paper
Volume 11 | Issue 3 | March 2024

JETIREXPLORE- Search Thousands of research papers



WhatsApp Contact
Click Here

Published in:

Volume 9 Issue 3
March-2022
eISSN: 2349-5162

UGC and ISSN approved 7.95 impact factor UGC Approved Journal no 63975

7.95 impact factor calculated by Google scholar

Unique Identifier

Published Paper ID:
JETIR2203365


Registration ID:
321473

Page Number

d512-d517

Share This Article


Jetir RMS

Title

TO COMPARE THE EFFECT OF MUSCLE ENERGY TECHNIQUE VS CORE STABILITY EXERCISES, COMBINE WITH ERGONOMIC ADVICE ON FUNCTION AND PAIN ON NON-SPECIFIC LOW BACK PAIN AMONG OFFICE WORKER – A COMPARITIVE STUDY

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Low back pain is an important clinical, social, economic, and public health problem affecting the population indiscriminately. It is a disorder with much possible aetiology, occurring in many groups of the population, and with many definitions. Consequently, the vast literature available on low back pain is not only heterogeneous but also contradictory. By definition, low back pain is a symptom that cannot be validated by an external standard, the symptom being what a person reports Numerous modalities of therapeutic interventions are available for treatment of chronic low back pain: surgery, drugs, manipulation, physical therapy, behaviour therapy, and neural blockade continue to spark debate among professionals, with regard to their effectiveness in managing chronic low back pain. METHOD: 66 patients with LBP, whose informed consents were obtained, were randomly assigned into 2 groups. One group received MET while the other group received core stability 6 weeks. VAS: visual analogue scale for pain assessment. Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire., Functional Rating Index was measured before and after 6 week of intervention. RESULTS: Mann whitney and Wilcoxon tests were used for all out come measures. It was observed that both group A and group B are effective in functions and reducing pain (p<0.001). But group A is more effective than group B (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Both techniques are equally effective for improving functions and reducing pain. But group A is more effective for reducing pain and improving functions than group B.

Key Words

Low back pain, Ergonomics, Core strength, MET.

Cite This Article

" TO COMPARE THE EFFECT OF MUSCLE ENERGY TECHNIQUE VS CORE STABILITY EXERCISES, COMBINE WITH ERGONOMIC ADVICE ON FUNCTION AND PAIN ON NON-SPECIFIC LOW BACK PAIN AMONG OFFICE WORKER – A COMPARITIVE STUDY", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.9, Issue 3, page no.d512-d517, March-2022, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2203365.pdf

ISSN


2349-5162 | Impact Factor 7.95 Calculate by Google Scholar

An International Scholarly Open Access Journal, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed Journal Impact Factor 7.95 Calculate by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage Journal Indexing in All Major Database & Metadata, Citation Generator

Cite This Article

" TO COMPARE THE EFFECT OF MUSCLE ENERGY TECHNIQUE VS CORE STABILITY EXERCISES, COMBINE WITH ERGONOMIC ADVICE ON FUNCTION AND PAIN ON NON-SPECIFIC LOW BACK PAIN AMONG OFFICE WORKER – A COMPARITIVE STUDY", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.9, Issue 3, page no. ppd512-d517, March-2022, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2203365.pdf

Publication Details

Published Paper ID: JETIR2203365
Registration ID: 321473
Published In: Volume 9 | Issue 3 | Year March-2022
DOI (Digital Object Identifier):
Page No: d512-d517
Country: Vadodara, Gujarat, India .
Area: Medical Science
ISSN Number: 2349-5162
Publisher: IJ Publication


Preview This Article


Downlaod

Click here for Article Preview

Download PDF

Downloads

000278

Print This Page

Current Call For Paper

Jetir RMS