UGC Approved Journal no 63975(19)

ISSN: 2349-5162 | ESTD Year : 2014
Call for Paper
Volume 11 | Issue 5 | May 2024

JETIREXPLORE- Search Thousands of research papers



WhatsApp Contact
Click Here

Published in:

Volume 10 Issue 9
September-2023
eISSN: 2349-5162

UGC and ISSN approved 7.95 impact factor UGC Approved Journal no 63975

7.95 impact factor calculated by Google scholar

Unique Identifier

Published Paper ID:
JETIR2309312


Registration ID:
524933

Page Number

d104-d112

Share This Article


Jetir RMS

Title

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE BUBBLE DECK SLAB AND CONVENTIONAL SLAB

Abstract

The most crucial component of any building structure that uses a lot of concrete is the slab. With the help of the ground-breaking building technique known as Bubble Deck, the amount of structurally futile concrete in the middle of a floor slab between columns is almost eliminated. This significantly reduces structural dead weight. The direct method of connecting air and steel is the basis of the unique approach used in Bubble Deck. Plastic balls are used to replace the concrete in the centre of a typical slab, which does not improve its structural performance. The result is a hollow, flat slab that spans in two directions. On the other hand, a conventional slab or normal slab is any slab that is supported by beams and columns. In these varieties, the slab has a short thickness while the beam has a significant depth. Following the columns, the load is passed to the load-bearing beams. Comparatively speaking, this needs more formwork than the Bubble Deck slab. The numerous studies on bubble deck and conventional slab systems were covered in this study. The specified aims must be realized through documentation effort and theoretical analysis of all the works on bubble deck and conventional slab concept produced by various writers. The concrete in the centre of the bubble deck slab was designed and built using hollow plastic bubbles to eliminate the concrete that serves no structural purpose and to reduce the weight of the slab itself. Therefore, compared to a normal concrete slab, the self-weight of a bubble deck slab can be lowered by around 30% to 50%, which can lessen the loads placed on columns, walls, and foundations. Finally, using a bubble deck slab has numerous advantages over using a traditional concrete slab, which include: better structural performance, lower materials and labor costs, quicker building times, and environmental friendliness. Additionally, it was found that the deflection of a bubble deck is 5.88% greater than that of a standard solid slab since the hollow component reduces stiffness. The shear resistance of a slab made of bubble deck material is 0.6 times more than a standard solid slab of equal thickness. However, by adding vertical reinforcement, the necessary resistance can be achieved.

Key Words

Conventional solid slab, Bubble deck slab, Steel reinforcement, Concrete, Hollow balls, Cement, Aggregate.

Cite This Article

"COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE BUBBLE DECK SLAB AND CONVENTIONAL SLAB", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.10, Issue 9, page no.d104-d112, September-2023, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2309312.pdf

ISSN


2349-5162 | Impact Factor 7.95 Calculate by Google Scholar

An International Scholarly Open Access Journal, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed Journal Impact Factor 7.95 Calculate by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage Journal Indexing in All Major Database & Metadata, Citation Generator

Cite This Article

"COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE BUBBLE DECK SLAB AND CONVENTIONAL SLAB", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.10, Issue 9, page no. ppd104-d112, September-2023, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2309312.pdf

Publication Details

Published Paper ID: JETIR2309312
Registration ID: 524933
Published In: Volume 10 | Issue 9 | Year September-2023
DOI (Digital Object Identifier):
Page No: d104-d112
Country: PRETORIA, Gauteng, South Africa .
Area: Engineering
ISSN Number: 2349-5162
Publisher: IJ Publication


Preview This Article


Downlaod

Click here for Article Preview

Download PDF

Downloads

00068

Print This Page

Current Call For Paper

Jetir RMS