Abstract
Cities have been spreading apart due to the recent decades' fast urbanization and population
expansion. This study examines the spatiotemporal dynamics of the urbanization process in
Delhi, the capital city of India, which is separated into nine districts, utilizing remote sensing
and spatial metrics (Jain, Dimri, & Niyogi, 2016). Based on unprocessed satellite imagery,
the urban patterns, and procedures within the city's nine administrative districts have been
identified considering. Calculations have been made for area, population, patch, edge, and
form metrics as well as Shannon's entropy and Pearson's chi statistics. The city is home to
three different kinds of urban patterns: 1) The districts that are most extensively distributed
are West, North, East, and North East; 2) North West, South, and South West are moderately
dispersed; and 3) Central and New Delhi are the least widely distributed. For the districts and
time periods, relative entropy which adjusts Shannon's entropy values from 0 to 1—is
computed. Its values from 1977 to 1993, 1993 to 2006, and 2006 to 2014 are, respectively,
0.80, 0.92, and 0.50, showing a significant degree of urban sprawl (Jain, Dimri, & Niyogi,
2016). In addition, this study examines and makes an attempt to quantify how urban sprawl
has changed land use and land cover over a five-decade period (1972–2014) in India's central
national capital region (CNCR).
In order to ascertain the patterns of urban growth and changes in land use and land cover in
Delhi between 1989 and 2014, satellite-based LULC maps were created and examined.
Afterwards, in order to calibrate the model and forecast the future extent of built-up areas, the
primary elements leading to urban growth were analyzed. To get the best outcomes, much
consideration was paid to model calibration. Our study illustrates the dynamics of change in
the urban environment of Delhi, India. The pattern of structural change is most prominently
characterized by the establishment of new towns and the distribution and density of
population between the spread and the core. However, it is debatable whether or not it is
useful to designate villages as census towns for the purpose of include them in the urban
agglomeration because it hides the underlying character of urbanization, which is
demonstrated by the shifting patterns within the urban spread.