• Narendra Solanki
• Pawan Dubey
• Hirendra Singh
• Rakesh Sakale

Significant advances have been made in the field of seismic structure design, requiring constant research and innovation. There is growing awareness of the ability to use non-destructive materials and technologies to reduce seismic risk. Structure movement during seismic events highlights the importance of building structures that can withstand external loads to prevent collapse and reduce damage. Among new solutions, composite walls have proven effective in overcoming these challenges. This study conducts a comparative study of the responses of high-rise buildings with RCC frames of different shapes (rectangular and circular) under seismic loading conditions. The shape of the building affects its behavior during an earthquake, especially when the building is high up. To be clear, building standards may not accurately reflect all aspects of the earthquake's impact, especially for non-pressure buildings. Therefore, further research and development is needed in this area to close existing gaps and improve the resilience process. The study focused on comparing various responses such as base shear force, maximum bending moment, shear and deflection between similar buildings and high-rise buildings with mixed lines. A detailed analysis was carried out using advanced software tools such as Bentley STAAD Pro to evaluate the performance of the 3m-storey G+ 30 models under seismic loading. In summary, this study contributes to the ongoing debate on seismic design, explains the impact of building quality on structural response, and highlights the need for continued innovation to improve the seismic resistance of tall buildings. Significant progress has been made in the field of seismic design and further research and innovation is needed. The use of non-traditional materials and new technologies will reduce the risk of earthquakes. During seismic events, dynamic forces occur in structures due to inertial forces, which indicate that structures that can withstand lateral loads are needed to prevent collapse. In this case, combined shear walls turned out to be a good solution. This study also makes a comparison between the responses of tall buildings with rectangular and circular RCC frames under seismic loads. The shape of the building affects its response to earthquakes, especially as the height increases. Given the limitations of the code in addressing various aspects of seismic impact, especially for tall buildings, further research is needed. This study aims to compare the base shear force, maximum bending moment, shear force and deflection responses of composite beams for similar buildings and structures. It was modeled using Bentley STAAD Pro software to evaluate the response of the G+30 model, with a floor height of 3 m, to seismic loading.

high-rise buildings, shape coefficient, wind load analysis, composite columns, foundation shear force, and building deflection

"COMPARATIVE STUDY ON SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF G+30 RECTANGULAR AND CIRCULAR BUILDING WITH OR WITHOUT SHEAR WALL BY USING STAAD PRO", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.11, Issue 4, page no.h87-h96, April-2024, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2404712.pdf

"COMPARATIVE STUDY ON SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF G+30 RECTANGULAR AND CIRCULAR BUILDING WITH OR WITHOUT SHEAR WALL BY USING STAAD PRO", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.11, Issue 4, page no. pph87-h96, April-2024, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2404712.pdf