UGC Approved Journal no 63975(19)
New UGC Peer-Reviewed Rules

ISSN: 2349-5162 | ESTD Year : 2014
Volume 12 | Issue 10 | October 2025

JETIREXPLORE- Search Thousands of research papers



WhatsApp Contact
Click Here

Published in:

Volume 12 Issue 2
February-2025
eISSN: 2349-5162

UGC and ISSN approved 7.95 impact factor UGC Approved Journal no 63975

7.95 impact factor calculated by Google scholar

Unique Identifier

Published Paper ID:
JETIR2502128


Registration ID:
554828

Page Number

b280-b300

Share This Article


Jetir RMS

Title

Agile and SAFe: A Comparative Analysis

Abstract

Agile and the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) are two widely adopted methodologies in software development, each offering distinct approaches to managing complex projects. Agile, rooted in the Agile Manifesto, emphasizes iterative development, flexibility, and customer collaboration. It is well-suited for small, self-organizing teams that prioritize adaptive planning and quick delivery. In contrast, SAFe is a more structured framework designed to scale Agile practices to large, enterprise-level organizations. It incorporates principles from Agile, Lean, and product development flow, aiming to align teams and departments towards common goals while maintaining the flexibility of Agile at the team level. This paper presents a comparative analysis of Agile and SAFe, highlighting their core principles, benefits, and challenges. It examines how Agile promotes rapid innovation through continuous feedback loops and self-organizing teams, fostering a culture of collaboration. SAFe, however, focuses on providing a scalable structure that ensures synchronization across multiple teams, departments, and stakeholders, emphasizing strategic alignment, governance, and value delivery at an organizational level. The paper also explores practical scenarios where each methodology is most applicable, providing insights into their strengths and weaknesses in different organizational contexts. Ultimately, while both Agile and SAFe aim to improve productivity, responsiveness, and value delivery, their suitability varies depending on the size and complexity of the organization. Understanding the nuances of each approach allows leaders to choose the most appropriate framework based on their specific needs and goals.

Key Words

Agile methodology, SAFe, Scaled Agile Framework, software development, iterative development, enterprise-level organizations, Lean principles, value delivery, organizational alignment, scalability, team collaboration, continuous feedback.

Cite This Article

"Agile and SAFe: A Comparative Analysis", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.12, Issue 2, page no.b280-b300, February-2025, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2502128.pdf

ISSN


2349-5162 | Impact Factor 7.95 Calculate by Google Scholar

An International Scholarly Open Access Journal, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed Journal Impact Factor 7.95 Calculate by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage Journal Indexing in All Major Database & Metadata, Citation Generator

Cite This Article

"Agile and SAFe: A Comparative Analysis", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.12, Issue 2, page no. ppb280-b300, February-2025, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2502128.pdf

Publication Details

Published Paper ID: JETIR2502128
Registration ID: 554828
Published In: Volume 12 | Issue 2 | Year February-2025
DOI (Digital Object Identifier):
Page No: b280-b300
Country: -, -, India .
Area: Engineering
ISSN Number: 2349-5162
Publisher: IJ Publication


Preview This Article


Downlaod

Click here for Article Preview

Download PDF

Downloads

000104

Print This Page

Current Call For Paper

Jetir RMS