UGC Approved Journal no 63975(19)
New UGC Peer-Reviewed Rules

ISSN: 2349-5162 | ESTD Year : 2014
Volume 12 | Issue 10 | October 2025

JETIREXPLORE- Search Thousands of research papers



WhatsApp Contact
Click Here

Published in:

Volume 12 Issue 2
February-2025
eISSN: 2349-5162

UGC and ISSN approved 7.95 impact factor UGC Approved Journal no 63975

7.95 impact factor calculated by Google scholar

Unique Identifier

Published Paper ID:
JETIR2502577


Registration ID:
555741

Page Number

f562-f567

Share This Article


Jetir RMS

Title

Comparative Study of ETo Prediction Methods Using Empirical Formula

Abstract

This study evaluates four widely used empirical and theoretical formulae for estimating reference evapotranspiration (ETo): Hargreaves, Blaney-Criddle, Pan Evaporation and Penman-Monteith equations. These methods are assessed using meteorological data, including temperature, relative humidity, wind speed and solar radiation to determine their predictive accuracy and reliability. To compare their performance, statistical metrics such as Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Coefficient of Determination (R² Score) are employed. MAE and RMSE measure the deviation between estimated and actual ETo values, while the R² score evaluates how well each model explains the variability in ETo. The results reveal that the Penman-Monteith equation consistently outperforms other methods, exhibiting the lowest RMSE and MAE values along with the highest R² score. Its superior accuracy is attributed to its comprehensive consideration of multiple meteorological parameters, particularly wind speed and radiation, which significantly influence evapotranspiration rates. In contrast, the Hargreaves and Blaney-Criddle equations, which rely primarily on temperature show higher errors due to their inability to account for the effects of humidity and wind. The Pan Evaporation method while moderately accurate, is dependent on local calibration and may not generalize well across different climatic conditions. These findings underscore the importance of selecting an appropriate ETo estimation method for irrigation planning and water resource management. The accuracy of the Penman-Monteith equation makes it the preferred choice for precise ETo estimation, particularly in regions with access to comprehensive meteorological data. However, in data-scarce areas simpler empirical models may still provide useful approximations with proper calibration. Future studies may focus on integrating machine learning techniques to enhance ETo prediction by combining empirical methods with data-driven approaches.

Key Words

Reference evapotranspiration (ETo): Hargreaves, Blaney-Criddle, Pan Evaporation and Penman-Monteith equations

Cite This Article

"Comparative Study of ETo Prediction Methods Using Empirical Formula", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.12, Issue 2, page no.f562-f567, February-2025, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2502577.pdf

ISSN


2349-5162 | Impact Factor 7.95 Calculate by Google Scholar

An International Scholarly Open Access Journal, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed Journal Impact Factor 7.95 Calculate by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage Journal Indexing in All Major Database & Metadata, Citation Generator

Cite This Article

"Comparative Study of ETo Prediction Methods Using Empirical Formula", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.12, Issue 2, page no. ppf562-f567, February-2025, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2502577.pdf

Publication Details

Published Paper ID: JETIR2502577
Registration ID: 555741
Published In: Volume 12 | Issue 2 | Year February-2025
DOI (Digital Object Identifier):
Page No: f562-f567
Country: Chennai , Tamilnadu, India .
Area: Engineering
ISSN Number: 2349-5162
Publisher: IJ Publication


Preview This Article


Downlaod

Click here for Article Preview

Download PDF

Downloads

000185

Print This Page

Current Call For Paper

Jetir RMS