• PRAJWAL M L
• Dr M KESHAVA MURTHY

The key word to keep in mind while designing any multistory building is earthquake. Because of the failure of the rupture plane or tectonic plate movements, a significant quantity of energy is released in the crust during an earthquake. Waves carry this energy to the earth's surface. The earth's surface has been devastated by this earthquake, and the building will also sustain harm. Thus, earthquakes are regarded as one of nature's most catastrophic phenomena. The seismic analysis in this work takes into account G+10, G+15, and G+20 storey buildings of RC conventional constructions and mivan structures. Both conventional RC conventional structures and mivan structures are seismically evaluated using the equivalent static method and response spectrum method. ETABs 2020 software used for the analysis of the building, by considering seismic zone V and medium soil (Type II) as per IS 1893-2016. Storey displacement and storey shear are considered for checking the performances of the building. Objective of this study is to compare results obtained from static and response spectrum analysis in both longitudinal and transverse direction.

RC Conventional Structures, Mivan Structures, Seismic analysis, Response spectrum method, Equivalent static method, storey responses

"COMPARATIVE SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF MULTISTOREY MIVAN STRUCTURES OVER CONVENTIONL RC STRUCTURES", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.12, Issue 7, page no.a71-a82, July-2025, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2507008.pdf

"COMPARATIVE SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF MULTISTOREY MIVAN STRUCTURES OVER CONVENTIONL RC STRUCTURES", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.12, Issue 7, page no. ppa71-a82, July-2025, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2507008.pdf