• Neha Manjunath
• Varshitha Kadem

The case is a landmark judgment that sought to define the extent of the rights of One under emergency conditions. During the Emergency, the Supreme Court affirmed in a majority decision the suspension of fundamental rights, including the right to personal liberty under habeas corpus. This was disappointing as the decision allowed the government to detain people without approaching the courts, which was seen as a “violation of human rights” and an example of the executive branch's unbridled authority. But the dissented note stressed on the sanctity of right to life and obligation of courts to protect the constitutions liberties, let alone emergency situation. It became one of the most important benchmarks in Indian constitutional law, which has roused discussions regarding national security and the fundamental freedom as well as the significance of the judiciary as the defender of protected rights.

ADM JABALPUR V SHIVKANT SHUKLA CASE ANALYSIS

"ADM JABALPUR V SHIVKANT SHUKLA, 1976 – CASE ANALYSIS", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.12, Issue 10, page no.a167-a176, October-2025, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2510019.pdf

"ADM JABALPUR V SHIVKANT SHUKLA, 1976 – CASE ANALYSIS", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.12, Issue 10, page no. ppa167-a176, October-2025, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2510019.pdf