UGC Approved Journal no 63975(19)
New UGC Peer-Reviewed Rules

ISSN: 2349-5162 | ESTD Year : 2014
Volume 13 | Issue 1 | January 2026

JETIREXPLORE- Search Thousands of research papers



WhatsApp Contact
Click Here

Published in:

Volume 13 Issue 1
January-2026
eISSN: 2349-5162

UGC and ISSN approved 7.95 impact factor UGC Approved Journal no 63975

7.95 impact factor calculated by Google scholar

Unique Identifier

Published Paper ID:
JETIR2601010


Registration ID:
573955

Page Number

a78-a95

Share This Article


Jetir RMS

Title

COMPARATIVE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND REHABILITATION OF RCC BOX CULVERT USING CFRP VS. GFRP COMPOSITES: A CASE STUDY ON NH-6

Abstract

This research focuses on the structural health assessment and subsequent rehabilitation of a reinforced concrete (RCC) box culvert ( 3 x 6.0m span) situated on the Odisha Border-Aurang section of NH-6. Initial inspections revealed flexural cracking, prompting a deeper investigation to determine the root causes and current structural safety. The study adopted a combined approach, utilizing theoretical design analysis alongside on-site diagnostic testing. A full-scale Bridge Load Test was executed using a 45-tonne vehicle (IRC Class A) following IRC SP-51 guidelines, supplemented by Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) methods including Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV), Rebound Hammer, and Carbonation depth analysis. While the load test indicated excellent elastic recovery (100%), surpassing the mandatory 75% limit, the structure failed serviceability requirements due to tension cracks exceeding the permissible 0.3 mm width. Based on these results, the study evaluates two retrofitting options: Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) and Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) laminates. Structural calculations indicated that while GFRP has a lower material cost, its lower modulus of elasticity necessitates 13 layers to achieve the same crack control as just 2 layers of CFRP. Therefore, CFRP was identified as the most technically and economically viable solution for this heavy-loading scenario. The proposed rehabilitation strategy involves epoxy grouting followed by the bonding of carbon fiber laminates to the deck slab.

Key Words

Cite This Article

"COMPARATIVE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND REHABILITATION OF RCC BOX CULVERT USING CFRP VS. GFRP COMPOSITES: A CASE STUDY ON NH-6", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.13, Issue 1, page no.a78-a95, January-2026, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2601010.pdf

ISSN


2349-5162 | Impact Factor 7.95 Calculate by Google Scholar

An International Scholarly Open Access Journal, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed Journal Impact Factor 7.95 Calculate by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage Journal Indexing in All Major Database & Metadata, Citation Generator

Cite This Article

"COMPARATIVE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND REHABILITATION OF RCC BOX CULVERT USING CFRP VS. GFRP COMPOSITES: A CASE STUDY ON NH-6", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.13, Issue 1, page no. ppa78-a95, January-2026, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2601010.pdf

Publication Details

Published Paper ID: JETIR2601010
Registration ID: 573955
Published In: Volume 13 | Issue 1 | Year January-2026
DOI (Digital Object Identifier):
Page No: a78-a95
Country: Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India .
Area: Engineering
ISSN Number: 2349-5162
Publisher: IJ Publication


Preview This Article


Downlaod

Click here for Article Preview

Download PDF

Downloads

0005

Print This Page

Current Call For Paper

Jetir RMS