UGC Approved Journal no 63975(19)
New UGC Peer-Reviewed Rules

ISSN: 2349-5162 | ESTD Year : 2014
Volume 13 | Issue 10 | October 2026

JETIREXPLORE- Search Thousands of research papers



WhatsApp Contact
Click Here

Published in:

Volume 13 Issue 10
October-2026
eISSN: 2349-5162

UGC and ISSN approved 7.95 impact factor UGC Approved Journal no 63975

7.95 impact factor calculated by Google scholar

Unique Identifier

Published Paper ID:
JETIR2610249


Registration ID:
587239

Page Number

c449-c469

Share This Article


Jetir RMS

Title

“Frame and Non-Frame Methods of Protection of Soil Slope”

Abstract

Soil slopes along highways, railways, canals, embankments and building sites are exposed to rainfall, surface runoff, seepage, weathering and, in some regions, earthquakes. If left unprotected, they suffer surface erosion, gully formation and shallow sliding, and may later fail in deep-seated movements that endanger life, disrupt transport and raise maintenance costs. This abstract reviews the two main families of slope-protection practice: frame methods and non-frame methods. Frame methods place a structural grid of reinforced concrete (cast-in-situ or precast) or masonry beams on the slope face. The grid is usually tied to stable ground with soil nails, rock bolts or prestressed anchors, and its cells are filled with vegetation, shotcrete or stone. Because it restrains the slope and spreads loads, it suits steeper, higher and weaker slopes. Non-frame methods protect or strengthen the slope surface directly, without a structural grid. They include vegetation and bioengineering, geosynthetics, shotcrete with wire mesh, stone pitching, riprap and gabions, always supported by surface and sub-surface drainage. They are faster, cheaper and more environment-friendly, but are generally limited to moderate slopes and shallow instability. The two families are compared on mechanism, suitable conditions, construction, cost, durability and environmental impact. The main conclusion is that selection should be governed by slope geometry, soil and groundwater conditions, climate, risk and maintenance capacity, and that a hybrid system, such as frame beams with vegetated infill and good drainage, often gives the most reliable and sustainable result.

Key Words

slope protection, frame beam, lattice beam, soil nailing, prestressed anchor, bioengineering, geosynthetics, shotcrete, erosion control, slope stability

Cite This Article

"“Frame and Non-Frame Methods of Protection of Soil Slope”", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.13, Issue 10, page no.c449-c469, October-2026, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2610249.pdf

ISSN


2349-5162 | Impact Factor 7.95 Calculate by Google Scholar

An International Scholarly Open Access Journal, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed Journal Impact Factor 7.95 Calculate by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage Journal Indexing in All Major Database & Metadata, Citation Generator

Cite This Article

"“Frame and Non-Frame Methods of Protection of Soil Slope”", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.13, Issue 10, page no. ppc449-c469, October-2026, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2610249.pdf

Publication Details

Published Paper ID: JETIR2610249
Registration ID: 587239
Published In: Volume 13 | Issue 10 | Year October-2026
DOI (Digital Object Identifier):
Page No: c449-c469
Country: Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India .
Area: Engineering
ISSN Number: 2349-5162
Publisher: IJ Publication


Preview This Article


Downlaod

Click here for Article Preview

Download PDF

Downloads

0001

Print This Page

Current Call For Paper

Jetir RMS