• Kamaljeet Singh

Judicial review applies to the authority of the courts to review the legitimacy of a statute or order and to determine it. Judicial advocacy, on the other hand, refers to the use of judicial authority to express and implement what is advantageous to society in general, and the power of the Supreme Court and the high court, but not the subordinate courts, to find the laws invalid and void suggests citizens at large or judicial activism. India has a separate judiciary with comprehensive authority over statutory and administrative activities. The theory in which legislative and executive decisions are subject to scrutiny by the judiciary may be described as judicial review. In general, it is known as the underlying structure of an autonomous judiciary. Judicial decision making may either be an action in favour of legislative and executive policy decisions or in opposition to them. Yet in general, the latter is referred to as judicial liberalism. The core of actual judicial activism is the making of decisions in the time and mood of the times.

Authority; Decision; Constitution of India; Judicial Activism; Judicial Review; Judiciary.

"Judicial Activism", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.6, Issue 2, page no.370-373, February-2019, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIREO06089.pdf

"Judicial Activism", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.6, Issue 2, page no. pp370-373, February-2019, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIREO06089.pdf