• Shankar Prasad S

Concepts under law are analyzed through jurisprudence. It also seeks to work out the basic concepts of laws. Not only does it analyze the laws that are already documented, but it also evaluates new rules and builds the basis for them. It is the product of the thought of jurists and philosophers. The right to view, evaluate and conclude about the legal system is open to them. In terms of how these questions can be best answered, general jurisprudence can be divided into categories i.e. by the form of inquiry scholars attempt to address and by the hypothesis of jurisprudence or schools of thought, both. Philosophical, analytical, historical, comparative, sociological are the numerous schools of jurisprudence that do not reflect different directions of response to a common aim, but rather different objectives. This paper is an aim towards studying these schools of jurisprudence in depth and to understand the ideologies given by different jurists explaining their own reasoning for the same.

Jurisprudence, Philosophical School, Historical School, Realist School, Sociological School, Analytical School.

"Schools of Jurisprudence: A Critical Study", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.6, Issue 3, page no.616-623, March-2019, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIREW06083.pdf

"Schools of Jurisprudence: A Critical Study", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.6, Issue 3, page no. pp616-623, March-2019, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIREW06083.pdf