UGC Approved Journal no 63975(19)
New UGC Peer-Reviewed Rules

ISSN: 2349-5162 | ESTD Year : 2014
Volume 13 | Issue 1 | January 2026

JETIREXPLORE- Search Thousands of research papers



WhatsApp Contact
Click Here

Published in:

Volume 13 Issue 1
January-2026
eISSN: 2349-5162

UGC and ISSN approved 7.95 impact factor UGC Approved Journal no 63975

7.95 impact factor calculated by Google scholar

Unique Identifier

Published Paper ID:
JETIRHG06017


Registration ID:
573641

Page Number

174-178

Share This Article


Jetir RMS

Title

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ONLINE AND PRINT READING:- A REVIEW

Abstract

Research comparing print and digital reading shows that while digital technologies are increasingly common, print often provides unique benefits for comprehension,annotation, and navigation. Studies in both educational and professional contexts reveal that readers frequently perceive paper as superior for learning, though results are inconsistent.Some research finds clear print advantages, others no difference, and some even highlight digital benefits. These contradictions are often due to differences in study design, participant characteristics, and the rapid evolution of digital devices.In early literacy, the assumption that narratives are “ primary” has been challenged. Kindergarten children demonstrate the ability to engage with informational books as effectively as with stories, sometimes preferring the former. This suggests that literacy education should expose children to a wider range of genres rather than focusing mainly on stories.In English as a Foreign Language contexts, contradictory findings also appear: some studies show printreading supports comprehension, others show digital reading does, while many find no significant difference. Methodological diversity and differing levels of digital literacy among participants contribute to these mixed outcomes.Beyond education, media studies reveal that the shift from print to online platforms affects public understanding of science and technology. For example,print coverage of nanotechnology has declined while online sources, particularly blogs, continue to expand, often emphasizing environmental issues more strongly. Overall, these studies indicate that the transition from print to digital is not simple substitution but a transformation that requires new teaching strategies,balanced research approaches, and awareness of how media platforms shape knowledge and discourse. reading on paper, although improvements in screen technology have reduced.

Key Words

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ONLINE AND PRINT READING:- A REVIEW

Cite This Article

"COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ONLINE AND PRINT READING:- A REVIEW", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.13, Issue 1, page no.174-178, January-2026, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIRHG06017.pdf

ISSN


2349-5162 | Impact Factor 7.95 Calculate by Google Scholar

An International Scholarly Open Access Journal, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed Journal Impact Factor 7.95 Calculate by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage Journal Indexing in All Major Database & Metadata, Citation Generator

Cite This Article

"COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ONLINE AND PRINT READING:- A REVIEW", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.13, Issue 1, page no. pp174-178, January-2026, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIRHG06017.pdf

Publication Details

Published Paper ID: JETIRHG06017
Registration ID: 573641
Published In: Volume 13 | Issue 1 | Year January-2026
DOI (Digital Object Identifier):
Page No: 174-178
Country: -, -, India .
Area: Engineering
ISSN Number: 2349-5162
Publisher: IJ Publication


Preview This Article


Downlaod

Click here for Article Preview

Download PDF

Downloads

0004

Print This Page

Current Call For Paper

Jetir RMS