UGC Approved Journal no 63975(19)

ISSN: 2349-5162 | ESTD Year : 2014
Call for Paper
Volume 11 | Issue 5 | May 2024

JETIREXPLORE- Search Thousands of research papers



WhatsApp Contact
Click Here

Published in:

Volume 9 Issue 6
June-2022
eISSN: 2349-5162

UGC and ISSN approved 7.95 impact factor UGC Approved Journal no 63975

7.95 impact factor calculated by Google scholar

Unique Identifier

Published Paper ID:
JETIR2206198


Registration ID:
404041

Page Number

b737-b752

Share This Article


Jetir RMS

Title

Analyzing & Comparing Hybrid Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames with the Conventional Buckling- Restrained Braced Frames

Abstract

Abstract : Structural frameworks that are accessible in construction laws are adjusted for good execution at extreme execution goals (like life wellbeing) under high tremor risk levels. Notwithstanding, building execution under low tremor perils is questionable. The ideal seismic underlying exhibition relies straightforwardly upon the capacity of stable hysteretic energy scattering of flexible frameworks. Structural systems that are available in building codes are calibrated for good performance at severe performance objectives (like life safety) under high earthquake hazard levels. However, building performance under low earthquake hazards is uncertain. The optimum seismic structural performance depends directly on the ability of stable hysteretic energy dissipation of ductile systems. This paper introduces a new structural steel system called hybrid buckling-restrained braced frame (BRBF). The “hybrid” term for the BRBF system comes from the use of different steel materials, including carbon steel (A36), high-performance steel (HPS) and low yield point (LYP) steel in the core of the brace. Nonlinear static pushover and nonlinear incremental dynamic analyses were conducted on a variety of BRBF models to compare the seismic behavior of standard and hybrid BRBF systems. Hybrid BRBF systems are shown to have a significant improvement over standard BRBF systems in terms of various damage measures including a significant reduction in the problematic residual displacements of the standard BRBFs

Key Words

Buckling-Restrained Braced Frame, Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis, Dual system, Residual drift

Cite This Article

"Analyzing & Comparing Hybrid Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames with the Conventional Buckling- Restrained Braced Frames", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.9, Issue 6, page no.b737-b752, June-2022, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2206198.pdf

ISSN


2349-5162 | Impact Factor 7.95 Calculate by Google Scholar

An International Scholarly Open Access Journal, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed Journal Impact Factor 7.95 Calculate by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage Journal Indexing in All Major Database & Metadata, Citation Generator

Cite This Article

"Analyzing & Comparing Hybrid Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames with the Conventional Buckling- Restrained Braced Frames", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.9, Issue 6, page no. ppb737-b752, June-2022, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2206198.pdf

Publication Details

Published Paper ID: JETIR2206198
Registration ID: 404041
Published In: Volume 9 | Issue 6 | Year June-2022
DOI (Digital Object Identifier):
Page No: b737-b752
Country: Nagpur, Maharashtra, India .
Area: Engineering
ISSN Number: 2349-5162
Publisher: IJ Publication


Preview This Article


Downlaod

Click here for Article Preview

Download PDF

Downloads

000231

Print This Page

Current Call For Paper

Jetir RMS