• Raghavendra Prasad H D
• Dushyanth V Babu R

The goals of long-term development would necessitate intervention on a number of fronts, like harnessing and using the potential of technological innovation. Carbon capture and recycling technologies, more efficient irrigation methods, essential medicines, domestic water purification devices, and manufacturing processes that eliminate pollution and degradation are only a few examples of such advances. This paper compares the environmental impacts of carbon capture and storage (CCS) as well as carbon capture and utilization (CCU) approaches. For this purpose, research on life cycle evaluation from the various literature have been discussed. There are a total of 27 reports, 11 of which are about CCS and 16 about CCU. CCS data shows that plants are decreasing their Global Warming Potential (GWP) by 63 percent to 82 percent, with combustion of oxygen-fuel in pulverized coal or IGCC plants obtaining the greatest reduction and retrieval after combustion in collective sequence gas turbine plants with smallest reductions. CCS is better than without environmental factors. CCU GWP varies widely depending on how it is used. The mineral carbonation reduces from 4 to 48 percent in comparison with no CCU.

CCS, CCU, Climate, Post-Combustion, Sustainable Development.

"Technologies Use for Carbon Capture and Storage", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.6, Issue 3, page no.300-306, March-2019, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIREW06041.pdf

"Technologies Use for Carbon Capture and Storage", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.6, Issue 3, page no. pp300-306, March-2019, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIREW06041.pdf